Cross-flow Insights
Compare everything in one place. A single sortable table shows started, completed, and completion rate for every guide — so you can see your whole onboarding at a glance and click into any one.
All guides, one table
Started, completed, and rate for every flow.
Sort and compare
Find your best and worst performers fast.
Drill in
Click any guide to see its full funnel.
Live in three steps.
Open Insights
See the cross-flow table.
Sort by what matters
Completion, starts, and more.
Dig in
Open a guide to investigate.
A Monday-morning portfolio review in five minutes.
Once you run a dozen guides, the question stops being "how is the tour doing" and becomes "which of these thirty things deserves my week". Insights is that review.
Scan the headline strip
Project-wide starts, completions, and average completion for the window. Down-and-to-the-right on the average is your early smoke alarm.
Sort the table
Every guide in one sortable table: started, completed, completion rate. Sort by completion ascending — the bottom three are this week's candidates for fixing or retiring.
Separate reach from content
High starts, low completion: a content problem — open that guide's funnel. Low starts: a reach problem — audience, trigger, or frequency. The split tells you which door to open.
Click through and fix
Each row links to the flow's full Reports. The portfolio view finds the patient; the per-guide funnel does the surgery.
What to expect: Guide review becomes a habit instead of an archaeology project. Teams that scan Insights weekly retire weak guides early — which is also what keeps rate limits from ever being the bottleneck.
When not to use cross-flow insights.
No pattern fits every job. Here’s where we’d point you at something else — sometimes ours, sometimes not.
Deep diagnosis
Insights tells you which guide is sick, not why. The why lives in the per-flow funnel, click actions, and replays — drill in rather than squinting at the table.
Cross-guide A/B conclusions
Two different guides' completion rates are not an experiment — different audiences, moments, and jobs. To compare variants of the same idea, run an actual experiment on one guide.
Business reporting
The table measures guide health, not revenue attribution. For "did onboarding move retention", export events to your warehouse and join against your own metrics.
What does the Insights page show?
Project-wide starts, completions, and average completion for the selected window, plus a sortable per-guide table (started / completed / completion rate) that links into each flow's detailed Reports.
How should I read high starts with low completion?
The guide reaches people and loses them — a content problem. Open its step funnel and find the drop-off step; the fix is usually shortening, re-anchoring, or easing a form.
And a published guide showing zeros?
SDK not installed where the guide should fire, or targeting that never matches — the Install page's detection status settles the first in seconds.
How often is a review worth doing?
Weekly scan, monthly pruning. The scan catches breakage and fatigue early; the pruning keeps your guide population small enough that each one still gets attention — both take minutes, not meetings.
Can I change the time window of the overview?
Yes — Insights aggregates over your selected date range, so a launch-week review and a quarterly review are the same page with different windows. The per-guide table recalculates for the range, which is how you spot a guide that was great last quarter and is fading this one.
See it on your own app.
Ship your first guide in minutes. Free to start — no credit card.